Ashley Gjovik
  • Home
  • About
    • Support
    • Contact
    • Photography
  • News (RSS)
  • Interviews & Press
  • Environmental Advocacy
    • Saratoga Creek System >
      • Clean Water Act Sixty Day Notice
      • Santa Clara Baylands
      • North Central Santa Clara Geology
      • Saratoga Creek & Bayside History
      • The Santa Clara Greenbelt
    • South Bay/Boston Marsh >
      • History of South Bay, South End, & Fort Point (19th-21st Century)
      • Boston History (Pre-19th Century)
      • The Hidden Hydrology of Boston & South End
      • South Bay Geotechnical Review
      • Geology of Boston
      • The Cesspool & Sewage Pollution
      • Sewer infrastructure and CSO Systems
      • South Bay Incinerator & Dump Site
      • Biological & Medical Hazards
      • Industrial History & Landfilling
      • Biota & Ecosystem
      • Declarations & Enforcement Actions
  • Gjovik v Apple
    • 3250 Scott Blvd (Chip Fab)
    • Triple Site (Superfund)
    • HAZWOPER Reading Room
    • About Ashley's Apple Saga
    • Termination Transcript
    • Justice at Apple
  • Research & Writing
    • Journal of Structural Power & Resistance
    • Academic Articles
    • Journal of Ecology & Evolution

Apple Signs Second Federal Labor Settlement Over Silencing of Employees — This Time About Worker Safety

8/26/2026

0 Comments

 
Statement of Ashley M. Gjøvik, Charging Party, NLRB Case 32-CA-282142

Five years ago, when I raised concerns about toxic chemical exposure in an Apple office, Apple's managers and "Employee Relations" told me — and by example, told every Apple employee — to stay quiet. Today, Apple has signed a federal settlement agreement with the National Labor Relations Board promising, in writing, that it will never do that again.

Under the settlement, Apple must post and email a federal Notice to Employees stating — in Apple's own signed words — that:
  • WE WILL NOT tell you not to speak with others about your working conditions, including your workplace environmental health and safety concerns.
  • WE WILL NOT tell you to use a "balancing test" — to make sure information is complete and accurate, doesn't cause panic, and makes no assessment about safety — before you talk to coworkers about health and safety.
  • WE WILL NOT tell you to come to us first before communicating your health and safety concerns to others.
  • WE WILL NOT direct you to refrain from talking with other employees while you are on administrative leave.
  • WE WILL NOT impliedly threaten you with discipline for talking with other employees about working conditions.

Read that list again. Every line corresponds to something Apple actually did in 2021 — by phone, by email, by video call — according to the federal complaint the NLRB's own prosecutors issued after a multi-year investigation. In 2021, Apple told a worker that talking about workplace safety was a "warning." In 2026, the federal government made Apple put the opposite in writing.

This is Apple's second NLRB settlement arising from my charges. In 2025, Apple was required to rescind unlawful confidentiality and employment policies nationwide (Case 32-CA-284428). Together, these settlements establish, on the public record, what Apple workers have always known and what Apple spent years denying: you have the legal right to talk to each other — about pay, about safety, about working conditions, about your leave, about your workplace — and no NDA, no policy, no manager, and no "Employee Relations" script can lawfully take that from you.

To every Apple employee who was told to stay quiet, who watched what happened to those of us who spoke up, and who thought twice before posting in that Slack channel: this Notice is for you. I signed the settlement — but I also filed a formal Statement with the NLRB, because this settlement does not go nearly far enough.

The case was gutted before it was settled. In September 2025, the NLRB withdrew the heart of the complaint — my unlawful suspension and termination — along with reinstatement, backpay, an apology, expungement, and mandatory training for Apple's managers. My appeal was denied this May purely on "prosecutorial discretion" grounds, with no ruling on the merits. My objections to that gutting are now incorporated into the settlement record.

One bulletin board is not a remedy. Apple's violations were committed by phone, email, and video, against remote employees, and were reported around the world. The settlement requires a paper posting next to a locker room in one building in Sunnyvale, plus an email to one team. The NLRB's own 2024 complaint demanded posting at all Apple facilities and on Slack, intranet, and email, plus training. The prior settlement in my other case was nationwide. I've asked the NLRB to explain why workers this time get a notice most affected employees will never see — and to require nationwide electronic posting or a reading of the Notice by a senior Apple executive.

Apple is a repeat offender. Federal settlement standards require considering a company's history of labor violations. Apple's recent record — the nationwide policy settlement, retail store cases, and multiple charges from other employees over the same 2021 events — should have produced a stronger remedy, not one of the lightest the agency offers.

The NLRB's General Counsel used to be Apple's defense lawyer — on this exact case. The current General Counsel of the NLRB, Crystal Carey, appeared as counsel of record for Apple, in this case, while at Morgan Lewis — her name is on the government's own service list from December 2024. She now runs the office with final, unreviewable authority over the case, and the office that would hear any appeal. I have formally asked the NLRB to disclose, on the record, whether she is recused, who actually made the decisions to shrink this case and approve this settlement, and how future compliance decisions will be walled off from the conflict. Workers are entitled to know whether the referee used to play for the other team — because in this case, she literally did.

I signed because Apple workers deserve this Notice now; not after more years of litigation. But make no mistake: a company worth trillions of dollars violated federal labor law, admitted nothing, and was asked for a piece of paper and an email. My civil case and Department of Labor proceedings continue, fully preserved. The evidence the government gathered remains available. And every Apple employee now has a signed federal document to point to the next time anyone at Apple suggests they should stay quiet.

The settlement agreement, Notice to Employees, complaints, and my filed Statement are available below.

- Ashley Gjovik 
gjovik_apple_32-ca-282142_joinder_reservation_statement_certified.pdf
File Size: 46381 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File

Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Author

    Updates from Ashley Gjovik about her whistleblower battle against Apple Inc.

    RSS Feed

    Archives

    August 2026
    June 2026
    April 2026
    March 2026
    February 2026
    January 2026
    December 2025
    November 2025
    October 2025
    September 2025
    August 2025
    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    June 2023
    January 2023
    July 2022
    January 2022
    September 2021
    August 2021

    Categories

    All
    Appeals
    Apple Inc
    Boston
    CERCLA
    Civil Lawsuit
    Clean Air Act
    Complaint
    CWA
    Decision
    Discovery
    EPCRA
    Inspection Report
    Labor
    NDAs
    NLRB
    Notice Of Hearing
    Protest
    Publication
    RCRA
    Sanctions
    Santa Clara
    Semiconductor Fab
    Sunnyvale
    Superfund Sites
    Surveillance
    Triple Site
    TSCA
    U.S. Courts
    US Dept. Of Labor
    US EPA
    Video
    Whistleblower

 

 

 

 

 

Original Content Copyright © Ashley M. Gjovik

[Contact]   [Privacy Policy]   [Disclaimer]
  • Home
  • About
    • Support
    • Contact
    • Photography
  • News (RSS)
  • Interviews & Press
  • Environmental Advocacy
    • Saratoga Creek System >
      • Clean Water Act Sixty Day Notice
      • Santa Clara Baylands
      • North Central Santa Clara Geology
      • Saratoga Creek & Bayside History
      • The Santa Clara Greenbelt
    • South Bay/Boston Marsh >
      • History of South Bay, South End, & Fort Point (19th-21st Century)
      • Boston History (Pre-19th Century)
      • The Hidden Hydrology of Boston & South End
      • South Bay Geotechnical Review
      • Geology of Boston
      • The Cesspool & Sewage Pollution
      • Sewer infrastructure and CSO Systems
      • South Bay Incinerator & Dump Site
      • Biological & Medical Hazards
      • Industrial History & Landfilling
      • Biota & Ecosystem
      • Declarations & Enforcement Actions
  • Gjovik v Apple
    • 3250 Scott Blvd (Chip Fab)
    • Triple Site (Superfund)
    • HAZWOPER Reading Room
    • About Ashley's Apple Saga
    • Termination Transcript
    • Justice at Apple
  • Research & Writing
    • Journal of Structural Power & Resistance
    • Academic Articles
    • Journal of Ecology & Evolution