Ashley Gjovik
  • Home
  • Apple Legal Battle
    • Ashley's Apple Story
    • Interviews & Press
    • TRW Microwave Superfund
    • Ashley v Apple Evidence Timeline
    • Termination Transcript
    • Justice at Apple
    • iWhistleblower
    • Reading Room
    • Apple History
  • Apple's Secret Fab
  • The Farallon Situation
  • Updates (RSS)
  • Support
  • Contact

8/29/2024 - California BAAQMD Cites Apple for Violations of Two Air Pollution Laws

8/29/2024

0 Comments

 
I filed a complaint about Apple's stupid secret fab with the BAAQMD on July 22 2024. 

On August 29 2024, the California Bay Area Air Quality Management District published formal notice of violations by Apple Inc of two violations of air pollution laws via their Skunkworks fab at 3250 Scott Blvd.

BAAQMD cited Apple for violating local air regulations 2-1-301 & 2-1-302 with their stupid secret fab.
References: 
Link: BAAQMD Regulation 2, Rule 1 - General Requirements 
Link: BAAQMD Notices of Violation
​
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
2-1-300 STANDARDS

​2-1-301 Authority to Construct: Any person who, after July, 1972, puts in place, builds, erects, installs, modifies, modernizes, alters or replaces any article, machine, equipment or other contrivance, the use of which may cause, reduce or control the emission of air contaminants, shall first secure written authorization from the APCO in the form of an authority to construct. Routine repairs, maintenance, or cyclic maintenance that includes replacement of components with identical components is not considered to be an alteration, modification or replacement for the purpose of this Section unless the APCO determines the changes to be non-routine. The use or operation of the source shall initiate the start-up period in accordance with Section 2- 1-411. (Amended 3/17/82; 10/19/83; 7/17/91; 5/17/00) 

​2-1-302 Permit to Operate: Before any person, as described in Section 2-1-401, uses or operates any article, machine, equipment or other contrivance, the use of which may cause, reduce or control the emission of air contaminants, such person shall first secure written authorization from the APCO in the form of a permit to operate. ​
0 Comments

2024/08/28 - U.S. GAO Releases Report on Employer Digital Surveillance, Referencing my Comments about Apple

8/28/2024

0 Comments

 
In 2023, the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) issued a formal Request for Information (RFI) titled “Automated Worker Surveillance and Management” (Federal Register Document ID: OSTP_FRDOC_0001-0008) to solicit public input on the use and impact of digital surveillance technologies in the workplace. The RFI sought perspectives from workers, labor organizations, advocacy groups, and others on the prevalence, design, deployment, and consequences of such surveillance — especially its potential effects on worker rights, mental and physical health, privacy, and workplace equity.

I submitted a public comment to OSTP on June 29, 2023, describing my direct experiences as a worker involved in labor agency proceedings, and raising concerns about corporate surveillance practices, including employee biometric data collection, mobile device monitoring, and privacy violations. My comment outlined policy, legal, and ethical concerns regarding these surveillance systems.

On August 28 2024, the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) published a report to Congress titled “Digital Surveillance of Workers: Tools, Uses, and Stakeholder Perspectives” (GAO-24-107639). The report explicitly incorporated and analyzed the full set of public comments submitted to OSTP’s RFI — including mine — and cited input from 217 comments across 211 stakeholders.

The GAO report specifically included a case that closely aligns with my submission, stating:
“One worker reported being fired from a large technology company after raising concerns about the company’s privacy policy, which empowered managers to access, search, monitor, archive, and delete data stored on any worker’s devices.”
Picture

​This passage, along with broader GAO findings, closely reflect themes raised in my comment, including:
  • Biometric surveillance (e.g., facial recognition, sleep, and menstruation tracking),
  • Invasions of personal and bodily privacy (including surveillance inside homes and bathrooms),
  • Retaliation against workers for raising privacy concerns.

My submission contributed to broader GAO assessments of:
  • Digital and bodily privacy violations,
  • Algorithmic discrimination and bias,
  • Workplace surveillance impacts on health and morale,
  • Impediments to labor organizing and collective action.
These issues were further highlighted in media coverage of the GAO report, including articles in Biometric Update and Labor & Employment Law Daily, which emphasized worker-submitted concerns as instrumental to shaping the federal response.
​

  • OSTP RFI: Federal Register Notice (88 FR 27932)
  • Comment Submission: Filed June 29, 2023 
  • GAO Report: GAO-24-107639 (August 2024)
  • GAO Blog Summary: "Why do I feel like somebody’s watching me?"
  • Media Coverage:
    • Biometric Update, "US workers concerned about employers’ digital snooping."
    • Labor & Employment Law Daily (via VitalLaw platform)
Your browser does not support viewing this document. Click here to download the document.
0 Comments

8/27/24 - U.S. Dept. of Labor Request for Appeal Accepted

8/27/2024

0 Comments

 
My request for appellate review by the US Dept of Labor's Admin Review Board was approved on August 27 2024, and the CERCLA whistleblower retaliation case is now docketed as Ashley Gjovik v Apple Inc, ARB-2024-0060, 2024-CER-00001.
Picture
​The U.S. Dept. of Labor ARB also issued an Order formally approving the appeal request and issuing a briefing schedule. I filed a Notice of Pendency in the civil lawsuit for our Case Mgmt Conference tomorrow. You can read the full Order in the filing here.
0 Comments

New Video: LaborFest 2024 Interview

8/27/2024

0 Comments

 
The recording of my LaborFest 2024 talk about Apple, hazardous waste, semiconductor fab, & workplace safety is now posted! Check it out! 

From the YouTube description:

"Apple in Santa Clara has illegally built a fabrication facility next to residential apartments in Santa Clara and has flagrantly violated EPA and other local and state  regulations in the operation of this facility. Ashley M. Gjøvik is a former Apple senior engineering program manager who  discovered that her office was above a contaminated dump site that was allowing fumes to enter the office and that her home was also located next to the illegal  Apple fabrication facility that was contaminating the Santa Clara neighborhood. When she blew the whistle she was targeted and terrorized by Apple in order to shut her down. She is now fighting Apple in Federal Court and filed a  RICO suit against Apple for its illegal activities. She also discovered that the oversight agencies which are supposed to protect her and the public have been captured by Apple and the corporations that they are supposed to be regulating. This presentation was made on July 21, 2024 as part of LaborFest.net which commemorates the 1934 San Francisco general strike  during the month of July and was also sponsored by WorkWeek. 

0 Comments

New Video: "Ashley Gjovik: Apple, Silicon Fabrication and Resistance"

8/6/2024

0 Comments

 
I'm incredibly honored to have my semiconductor fab story spotlighted by Monroe Labs on the "Microsoft - A Materialist Approach" YouTube channel. Check it out! 

From the YouTube description: 

"In today’s video, we’ll take a detour from examining Microsoft’s activities to talk about Apple. Specifically, the health and legal struggles of Ashley Gjovik (whose name I mispronounced as Grovnik in this video), inflicted on her by Apple. We’ll also talk about the work Gjovik has been doing shining a light on the ecological and health impacts of Apple’s chip fabrication facilities which are little reported on.

When most people think of Apple, what comes to mind is the image it has crafted for itself: ultra competence, austere efficiency, design excellence and echoes of the myth of California - progressive and open. 

Of course, Apple is a corporation and operates according to the rules of capitalist political economy and also, the power imperatives of capitalist enterprises -  an imperial disdain for people’s lives because profit is uber alles.

In June of 2024, Gjovik posted an overview of her experiences and findings on LinkedIn which I read for you. By the way, the music you’re hearing is from the album, Architect of Truth by Robert Beshara. The song is Whiplash. Link in the show description."


0 Comments

    Author

    Updates from Ashley Gjovik about her whistleblower battle against Apple Inc.

    RSS Feed

    Archives

    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    June 2023
    January 2023
    July 2022
    January 2022
    September 2021
    August 2021

    Categories

    All
    Appeals
    Apple Inc
    CERCLA
    Civil Lawsuit
    Clean Air Act
    Complaint
    Decision
    Discovery
    Inspection Report
    Labor
    NDAs
    NLRB
    Notice Of Hearing
    Publication
    RCRA
    Sanctions
    Santa Clara
    Semiconductor Fab
    Sunnyvale
    Superfund Sites
    Surveillance
    Triple Site
    TSCA
    U.S. Courts
    US Dept. Of Labor
    US EPA
    Video
    Whistleblower

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright © Ashley M. Gjovik

[Contact]    [Consulting]   [Privacy Policy]   [Disclaimer]
  • Home
  • Apple Legal Battle
    • Ashley's Apple Story
    • Interviews & Press
    • TRW Microwave Superfund
    • Ashley v Apple Evidence Timeline
    • Termination Transcript
    • Justice at Apple
    • iWhistleblower
    • Reading Room
    • Apple History
  • Apple's Secret Fab
  • The Farallon Situation
  • Updates (RSS)
  • Support
  • Contact