|
I had asked the Judge to stay the next amended complaint until the appeal concludes, as I will likely need to re-do and un-do much of the work after the appellate court issues an order. The judge denied my request and said I still have to amend my complaint per his prior decision. I filed the Fifth Amended Complaint on Nov. 7 2024, but made sure I complained about it. You can read it here. Fifth Amended Complaint:
0 Comments
On October 23 2024, I filed a Motion to Stay the district court proceedings pending the Ninth Circuit appeal. You can read that motion here. The hearing is scheduled for Dec. 19 2024. However, instead of responding in a normal way, on Nov. 6 2024, Apple filed a one and half page response unilaterally declaring the appeal is dismissed and accusing me of improper conduct. You can read their filing here. I needed to file something anyways to apologize for missing my deadline on the amended complaint, so I also took the opportunity to clarify that the appeal is still pending to ask for the millionth time that Apple stop harassing me. You can read that filing here. Motion to Stay:
Apple had filed an opposition to my appeal of the U.S. Dept. of Labor toxic waste whistleblower case & reading Apple's response, and having to respond to it, was just as enjoyable as stabbing pencils into my eyes. You can read that here. I filed my Reply to U.S. Dept. of Labor on Nov. 6 2024, cutting it close at literally midnight - but getting it in. US Dept. of Labor accepted it later that day. U.S. Dept. of Labor ARB appellate reply:
|
AuthorUpdates from Ashley Gjovik about her whistleblower battle against Apple Inc. Archives
December 2025
Categories
All
|
||||||||||||||||||
RSS Feed