On October 25 2023, Ashley Gjovik filed her first amended complaint in the civil lawsuit.

Ashley Gjovik v Apple Inc, 3:23-CV-04597, US District Court, Northern District of California, SF Division

View the complaint here: ​https://gjovik.co/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Gjovik-v-Apple-Amended-Complaint.pdf

View the docket: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67772913/gjovik-v-apple-inc/

Ashley Gjovik filed a civil lawsuit against Apple Inc on September 7 2023. 

Ashley Gjovik v Apple Inc, 3:23-CV-04597, US District Court, Northern District of California, SF Division

Read the complaint: https://gjovik.co/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Gjovik-v-Apple-Complaint.pdf

View the docket: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67772913/gjovik-v-apple-inc/

Read the announcement: https://ashleygjovik.substack.com/p/apple-corporate-crime-update

On June 12 2023, Ashley filed a complaint to the US EPA, CalEPA, and city HazMat about Apple's stealth semiconductor fabrication activities at 3250 Scott Blvd and Gjovik (and other's) resulting illness.

Read the complaint: www.ashleygjovik.com/uploads/1/3/7/0/137008339/3250_scott_complaint_-_final.pdf

On January 30 2023, the US NLRB issued a Decision of Merit on two of Gjovik's NLRB charges. The charges were filed in October of 2021 and alleged Apple's employee handbook, NDAs, and a threatening email sent by Tim Cook, all violate the NLRA.

View some of the press coverage: 

• TechCrunch, Labor officials found that Apple execs infringed on workers’ rights
• CNN, Apple has infringed on worker rights, NLRB investigators say
• The Register, Watchdog: There just may be something in these claims Apple broke labor laws
• Entrepreneur, 'This Culture Of Secrecy Is Not Okay': Former Apple Employee Celebrates NLRB Decision That It Violated Worker Rights

Ashley won the appeal of her California unemployment insurance claim on July 14 2022. The Administrative Law Judge wrote: 

"Prior to the filing of the claim for benefits the claimant last work in September of 2021 as a senior engineering program manager at a salary of $169,000 per year. She worked approximately six and a half years for the employer.

The claimant received notice from the vice president that she was being discharged. The notice was vague and incomplete and stated that the claimant had disclosed confidential information and had not fully participated in some investigation. Although the claimant requested specific information from the employer, no specific information was provided.

Prior to the separation of the employment the claimant received great performance reviews and prior to the separation the claimant received no oral or written warning notifying her that job was in jeopardy. At all times the claimant performed her job duties to the best of her ability.....

In this matter the evidence shows that the claimant was discharged for reasons other than misconduct connected with the most recent work. Since the claimant performed her job duties to the best of her ability and had not received warnings putting her on notice that her job was in jeopardy, the claimant was discharged for reasons other than misconduct and she is qualified for benefits under section 1256."

View the decision.

On January 10 2022, Ashley filed another NLRB charge to capture the continuing harassment, intimidation, coercion, and retaliation that had occurred after she was fired. 

The charge is # 32-CA-288816

On September 16 2021, Ashley filed a second charge with the NLRB accusing Apple of violation the NLRA when it fired her on September 9 2021.

The charge is # 32-CA-283161

On August 29 2021, Ashley filed a charge with the U.S. Department of Labor Directorate of Whistleblower Protection Program. 

The case is: Apple Inc/Gjovik/9-3290-22-051

On August 29 2021, Ashley filed a complaint to the US EPA about Apple, the TRW Microwave Superfund site, and the cracks in the foundation.

Due to Gjovik's disclosures, the US EPA inspected the site and found a number of CERCLA issues that required oversight for multiple years after.