Ashley Gjovik
  • Home
  • Saratoga Creek/Bayside
    • Saratoga Creek System
    • Clean Water Act Sixty Day Notice
    • Saratoga Creek & Bayside History
  • 3250 Scott Blvd (Chip Fab)
  • Triple Site
    • Triple Site (Superfund)
    • HAZWOPER Reading Room
  • Roxbury Canal & South Bay
    • Boston's South Bay & the Roxbury Canal
    • Site History (Pre-19th Century)
    • The Hidden Hydrology of Boston & South End
    • South Bay Geotechnical Review
    • The Cesspool & Sewage Pollution
    • Sewer infrastructure and CSO Systems
    • South Bay Incinerator & Dump Site
    • Biological & Medical Hazards
    • Industrial History & Landfilling
    • Biota & Ecosystem
    • Petition & Complaint
    • Declarations & Enforcement Actions
  • Ashley's Apple Saga
    • Gjovik v Apple (Legal)
    • About Ashley's Apple Saga
    • Interviews & Press
    • Termination Transcript
    • Justice at Apple
  • Updates (RSS)
  • Support
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Consulting Website

US EPA announces federal enforcement action against Apple Inc over hazardous waste & air pollution violations at a Santa Clara chip fab

11/5/2025

0 Comments

 
The US EPA announced a finalized federal enforcement action (including a $261,283 fine & federal consent agreement) against Apple Inc over this unpermitted semiconductor manufacturing facility, next to thousands of homes and a playground, in Santa Clara, California.
​The US EPA has now published the legal documents and the case docket for their RCRA ("Resource Conservation and Recovery Act" federal hazardous waste management) enforcement action taken against Apple Inc over Apple's Santa Clara semiconductor manufacturing facility at 3250 Scott Blvd.

​The Consent Agreement and Final Order was signed and finalized as Case. No. RCRA-09-2026-0006, dated Oct. 27 2025.

View the Settlement Agreement
& Final Order
apple_inc._rcra-09-2026-0006_3250_scott.pdf
File Size: 1329 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File

In the Matter of Apple, Inc., U.S. EPA Docket No. RCRA-09-2026-0006,
​Consent Agreement and Final Order (EPA Region IX Oct. 27, 2025)

The Agreement & Order determined Apple was generating, treating, storing, and disposing of federally regulated hazardous waste at 3250 Scott Blvd without federally required permits (¶ 27, 43, 53); was unlawfully venting "solvent exhaust...directly to the atmosphere" (¶ 47); was unlawfully asserting, without analysis, that its federally regulated hazardous waste was not federally regulated hazardous waste (¶ 31-33, 36-38); generated more than 1,000kg of federally regulated hazardous waste per month (¶ 28), yet abandoned that waste on weekends and holidays and did not monitor, inspect, or document that waste as required (¶ 60-61); stored federally regulated hazardous waste onsite without required labels or information, or even closing the containers (¶ 52, 53, 56-57).

The Agreement and Order explains this enforcement action arose out of my "Tip and Complaint" to the US EPA in June 2023 regarding Apple's operations at this facility, and that Apple was informed the inspection (and resulting enforcement action was due to my complaints to the EPA). (¶ 12-13). Note: I specifically asked EPA to tell Apple that I was the one who sent them. (view the June 12 2023 Complaint as a PDF or in DropBox with attachments).

The Agreement and Order states the enforcement action was based on inspection findings documented in a Notice of Violation and Requests for Information dated April 30 2024 (view the report as a PDF, or a larger PDF with attachments, or on Dropbox with all attachments and additional records) (¶ 15-16) and Nov. 6 2024 (¶ 17); and a Notice of Potential Enforcement Action sent June 26 2025 (¶ 19). (view the PDF).

The enforcement action is based only on violations of the RCRA identified during EPA inspections on August 17-18 2023 and January 16 2024. The Agreement & Order specifically preserved jurisdiction for my Citizen Suit to continue to prosecute Apple and other defendants over violations of other federal environmental laws at this facility and any other violations of the RCRA not expressly settled at this facility. The Agreement and Order only settles liability regarding financial penalties for the specific violations identified by EPA on the specific inspection dates noted, but still allows me to still seek injunctive relief or other equitable relief, or for the DOJ to seek criminal sanctions, even for these same violations. (¶ 80-82). The Agreement and Order also still allows me to seek penalties for additional RCRA violations identified in the Citizen Suit if in addition to the ones EPA identified during its inspections. (¶ 74).
In the consent agreement, Apple does not admit or deny any "specific factual allegations" but does "waive any right to contest the allegations and its right to appeal" (¶ 69) and "waives any rights or defenses... for this matter to be resolved in federal court" (¶ 70) if filed by the EPA (¶ 83). Apple certified "under penalty of law to EPA" that "to the best of [its] knowledge and belief formed after reasonably inquiry of individuals immediately responsible for compliance at this Facility" that "it has taken steps necessary to comply with RCRA... for the specific violations at the Facility alleged in the [Agreement & Order]." (¶ 71-72). Critically, this means that the US EPA is closing this matter by taking Apple's word for it that Apple resolved these violations. While its important that US EPA took this enforcement action, the Agreement and Order makes no factual finding the violations are actually resolved or that Apple changed its practices in such a way to prevent violations from re-occurring. This makes my pending environmental Citizen Suit even more critical. 

The Consent Agreement & Final Order contains seven counts, grouping hundreds of individual violations under specific types of RCRA violations including:
  • Unlawfully assuming the factory's industrial waste is not federally regulated hazardous waste, without completing the legally required analysis, then unlawfully managing that waste as if it was not federally regulated, when it was in fact federally regulated, corrosive and flammable, hazardous waste. This included a 1700-gallon solvent waste tank that contained federally regulated hazardous waste. (Count I)
  • Unlawfully transporting that federally regulated hazardous waste as if it were not federally regulated, including using inaccurate and incomplete shipping manifests and providing false information to the transportation company a receiving waste disposal company (Count II)
  • Unlawfully "operating a hazardous waste management facility without a permit... for storage of hazardous waste." (Count III & V). This included violations with multiple containers of federally regulated hazardous waste that "were not labelled or dated," or where labels "were not clearly visible for inspection," and/or were sitting onsite for more than three months.
  • Unlawfully venting the unpermitted 1,700 gallon hazardous waste tank "solvent exhaust...directly to the atmosphere" without abating the "air pollutant emissions" and without any "control device" to control the emissions. (Count IV).
  • Unlawfully storing federally regulated hazardous waste in unsealed 55-gallon containers, where the waste is not contained. (Count VI).
  • Unlawfully failing "to perform and document" federally required daily inspections of the "solvent waste tank on weekends and holidays" and any daily inspections of the "solvent waste lift station tank," when both contained federally regulated hazardous waste. (Count VII).

Apple is concurrently facing citations for violations of air pollution laws, with open cases filed by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) in Aug.-Sept. 2024 complaining Apple was operating the facility without required air permits, venting the solvent waste tank to the atmosphere without abatement, and exhausting unlawful amounts of nitric oxide and nitrogen dioxide into the ambient air. (view the citations here).

As noted, the RCRA violations cited by US EPA at 3250 Scott Blvd in this case included a 1,700 gallon solvent waste tank that did not have required permits, that was managing federally regulated hazardous waste but which Apple claimed was not federally reregulated hazardous waste, and Apple was venting the hazardous waste solvent exhaust to the atmosphere (where the apartment windows and fresh air intakes are located) without abatement of the pollution and without air pollution permits. The April 2024 EPA report notes Apple claimed it was operating this tank (unlawfully) since 2017.
OCT. 27 2025 US EPA ENFORCEMENT ACTION 

Docket: In re Apple, Inc., US EPA Docket No. RCRA-09-2026-0006 (Oct. 27, 2025)

Filing: Consent Agreement and Final Order, In re Apple, Inc., EPA Docket No. RCRA-09-2026-0006 (Region 9, Oct. 27, 2025)

Citation: In the Matter of Apple, Inc., U.S. EPA Docket No. RCRA-09-2026-0006, Consent Agreement and Final Order (EPA Region IX Oct. 27, 2025)

Reference: US EPA resources with information about RCRA (commonly pronounced as "rick-rah"): Overview; History; Compliance.

ENVIRONMENTAL CITIZEN SUIT (SEPT. 2025 - ONGOING).

Gjovik v. Apple Inc., Santa Clara, Khalil Jenab, et al., No. 5:25-cv-07360 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 2, 2025-)
Free, public access to the Citizen Suit case docket is available on CourtListener here: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71272728/gjovik-v-apple-inc/
2016 CALIFORNIA DTSC CONSENT AGREEMENT 

In 2016, Apple entered a hazardous waste Consent Agreement with the California EPA over hazardous waste violations at two different Apple facilities in Cupertino and Sunnyvale. The agreement was for at least five years and covered all Apple hazardous waste activities in California. The agreement similarly found that Apple was violating hazardous waste laws under both federal and state laws including many of the same issues at 3250 Scott Blvd including operating without required permits, failing to properly label and mark hazardous waste, and unlawfully transporting hazardous waste without required manifests or records (including unlawfully exporting hazardous waste to other countries). DTSC fined Apple $450,000. 

View the 2016 
Complaint, Settlement Agreement, and Announcement. In 2016, Apple's environmental team told Reuters that "This matter involves an oversight in filing paperwork... We've worked... to ensure that going forward we have the proper permits for our current site. As we do with all our facilities, we followed our stringent set of health and safety standards, which go well beyond legal requirements." (See, California EPA says settled with Apple on hazardous waste claims). The Consent Agreement could only be terminated if Apple demonstrated compliance with hazardous waste laws at all of its facilities. At the time Apple was able to obtain a termination of the agreement in 2020, Apple was admittedly in violation of federal hazardous waste laws at 3250 Scott Blvd. If the 2017-2025 RCRA violations had been identified and reported, those violations likely would have prevented the termination of the 2016-2020 California EPA Consent Agreement. 

Please feel free to contact me with any questions or requests for information.

​-Ashley 
​
0 Comments

US EPA Notice of Enforcement Action re: 3250 Scott Blvd

6/26/2025

0 Comments

 
On June 26 2025, US EPA served Apple with a notice of RCRA enforcement action re: Apple's fab at 3250 Scott Blvd, in Santa Clara, California.

Read the notice here.
Picture
Picture
Picture
0 Comments

9/12/2024 - BAAQMD Cites Apple for Violating four more Air Pollution laws

9/12/2024

0 Comments

 
I filed a complaint about Apple's stupid secret fab with the BAAQMD on July 22 2024. 

On August 29 2024, the California Bay Area Air Quality Management District published a formal notice of violations by Apple Inc of two violations of air pollution laws via their Skunkworks fab at 3250 Scott Blvd.

Then on September 12 2024 (probably after an inspection?) BAAQMD cited Apple for four additional violations - 2-1-301 & 2-1-302 again, and also for "gaseous pollution."

Apple apparently violated regulation 2-1-301 when it built/installed equipment that causes air pollution without first getting permission from BAAQMD; then violated -302 by operating the fab for around eight years without required permits.

Then, Apple also violated 9-7-307.1 by dumping illegal amounts of NOx & CO into our air.
Picture
Picture
References: 
  • Link: BAAQMD Regulation 9, Rule 7 - Gaseous Pollutants
  • Link: BAAQMD Regulation 2, Rule 1 - General Requirements 
  • Link: BAAQMD Notices of Violation
​
9-7-300 STANDARDS  

9-7-307 Final Emission Limits:
​No person shall operate a boiler, steam generator or process heater with a rated heat input listed in the table below that exceeds the corresponding NOx and CO emission limits on or after the...

Read More
0 Comments

8/29/2024 - California BAAQMD Cites Apple for Violations of Two Air Pollution Laws

8/29/2024

0 Comments

 
I filed a complaint about Apple's stupid secret fab with the BAAQMD on July 22 2024. 

On August 29 2024, the California Bay Area Air Quality Management District published formal notice of violations by Apple Inc of two violations of air pollution laws via their Skunkworks fab at 3250 Scott Blvd.

BAAQMD cited Apple for violating local air regulations 2-1-301 & 2-1-302 with their stupid secret fab.
References: 
Link: BAAQMD Regulation 2, Rule 1 - General Requirements 
Link: BAAQMD Notices of Violation
​
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
2-1-300 STANDARDS

​2-1-301 Authority to Construct: Any person who, after July, 1972, puts in place, builds, erects, installs, modifies, modernizes, alters or replaces any article, machine, equipment or other contrivance, the use of which may cause, reduce or control the emission of air contaminants, shall first secure written authorization from the APCO in the form of an authority to construct. Routine repairs, maintenance, or cyclic maintenance that includes replacement of components with identical components is not considered to be an alteration, modification or replacement for the purpose of this Section unless the APCO determines the changes to be non-routine. The use or operation of the source shall initiate the start-up period in accordance with Section 2- 1-411. (Amended 3/17/82; 10/19/83; 7/17/91; 5/17/00) 

​2-1-302 Permit to Operate: Before any person, as described in Section 2-1-401, uses or operates any article, machine, equipment or other contrivance, the use of which may cause, reduce or control the emission of air contaminants, such person shall first secure written authorization from the APCO in the form of a permit to operate. ​
0 Comments

6/21/2024 - US EPA RCRA Enforcement Inspection Report Released

6/21/2024

0 Comments

 
On June 21 2024, the US EPA released an enforcement report with 18 exhibits, that confirmed Apple Inc is operating an unpermitted *semiconductor fabrication* facility in one of the busiest and most trafficked areas in the city of Santa Clara, California.

The report, along with Apple's own regulatory filings, confirmed this facility is emitting hazardous waste vapors, fumes, and gases into the outdoor air around the building. The report also confirmed that Apple is engaged in hazardous waste treatment and disposal, including these air emissions, without the permits, records, and monitoring required by federal law.

This nondescript building sits directly across the street from high-density residential apartments (
Santa Clara Square), and a variety of commercial buildings including, but not limited to: a Whole Foods grocery store, several restaurants with outdoor patios, and a yoga studio. There is also a school within 1,000 feet, and two public parks within 200 feet of this factory.

Back in February 2023, through my own research, I discovered that Apple was doing silicon fab at the facility. I spent several months researching further, gathering records, speaking with agencies, and drafting a formal complaint. Because of all of the evidence and information I gathered, I was able to successfully trigger a US EPA RCRA Compliance & Enforcement investigation, which then led to at least three on site inspections, as described in the report. US EPA found at least *19* unique violations of RCRA during these inspections.

Semiconductor fab is one of the most dangerous types of manufacturing in history; for the workers inside the plant, and also for the people and environment outside the plant. I became seriously ill while living at the Santa Clara Square apartments several years ago - and the illness was diagnosed by chemical exposure doctors as exposure to industrial chemicals from an unknown source. I went public about it, and additional victims promptly came forward. But the government could not figure out where the chemicals were coming from. Its clear now what the source was.

Its unclear how many people were exposed and injured by Apple's illegal manufacturing operations. I am lobbying for involvement from the Dept of Public Health to investigate the extent of the damage Apple has caused to probably thousands of human lives. There is also a question of harm to environment, and harm to the properties of all of the homes and small businesses surrounding this factory.

I feel very proud and relieved that all of my hard work from 2020 to 2023 investigating the chemical hazards in that area resulted in so much action from the government, and identified such a dangerous situation that required intervention - but there is still a lot of work to be done.


The US EPA RCRA Inspection report and all of its exhibits are available via my Dropbox.

There's also a few social media threads about the report:
- Twitter @ashleygjovik
- Mastodon @ashleygjovik
- BlueSky @ashleygjovik
0 Comments

3/10/2024 - Ashley Files Interview Record for Triple Site Five Year Review

3/10/2024

0 Comments

 
On March 10 2024, Ashley submitted a community stakeholder interview record to the US EPA and USACE for the Five Year Review process at the Triple Site in Sunnyvale, California.

Read the submission here: ​​https://www.ashleygjovik.com/uploads/1/3/7/0/137008339/us-epa-fyr-triple-site-gjovik-interview-final-full.pdf
0 Comments

    Author

    Updates from Ashley Gjovik about her whistleblower battle against Apple Inc.

    RSS Feed

    Archives

    December 2025
    November 2025
    October 2025
    September 2025
    August 2025
    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    June 2023
    January 2023
    July 2022
    January 2022
    September 2021
    August 2021

    Categories

    All
    Appeals
    Apple Inc
    CERCLA
    Civil Lawsuit
    Clean Air Act
    Complaint
    CWA
    Decision
    Discovery
    EPCRA
    Inspection Report
    Labor
    NDAs
    NLRB
    Notice Of Hearing
    Protest
    Publication
    RCRA
    Sanctions
    Santa Clara
    Semiconductor Fab
    Sunnyvale
    Superfund Sites
    Surveillance
    Triple Site
    TSCA
    U.S. Courts
    US Dept. Of Labor
    US EPA
    Video
    Whistleblower

 

 

 

 

 

Original Content Copyright © Ashley M. Gjovik

[Contact]    [Consulting]   [Privacy Policy]   [Disclaimer]
  • Home
  • Saratoga Creek/Bayside
    • Saratoga Creek System
    • Clean Water Act Sixty Day Notice
    • Saratoga Creek & Bayside History
  • 3250 Scott Blvd (Chip Fab)
  • Triple Site
    • Triple Site (Superfund)
    • HAZWOPER Reading Room
  • Roxbury Canal & South Bay
    • Boston's South Bay & the Roxbury Canal
    • Site History (Pre-19th Century)
    • The Hidden Hydrology of Boston & South End
    • South Bay Geotechnical Review
    • The Cesspool & Sewage Pollution
    • Sewer infrastructure and CSO Systems
    • South Bay Incinerator & Dump Site
    • Biological & Medical Hazards
    • Industrial History & Landfilling
    • Biota & Ecosystem
    • Petition & Complaint
    • Declarations & Enforcement Actions
  • Ashley's Apple Saga
    • Gjovik v Apple (Legal)
    • About Ashley's Apple Saga
    • Interviews & Press
    • Termination Transcript
    • Justice at Apple
  • Updates (RSS)
  • Support
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Consulting Website